I share this post with you as it would have an impact on your geopolitical perspective.
By Vladimir Socor. Jamestown Foundation .
The Ukrainian government is launching
major natural gas extraction projects in the country, as joint ventures with
leading Western companies (Interfax-Ukraine, Ukrinform, November 5). At
present, Ukraine depends on Russian gas imports for more than 60 percent of
Ukraine’s total annual consumption (Bloomberg, November 7). The government’s
goal is not simply to reduce Ukraine’s dependence on Russian gas, but—far more
boldly—to eliminate that dependence entirely and achieve self-sufficiency by
boosting gas extraction within the country.
The Ukrainian government is currently
working with Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Royal Dutch Shell toward that goal. These
projects are variously targeting shale gas, tight gas, and conventional gas,
onshore and offshore on Ukrainian territory.
According to President Viktor
Yanukovych’s statement, occasioned by the agreement just signed with Chevron
(see below), the projects with Shell, ExxonMobil, and Chevron would enable
Ukraine to become self-sufficient for gas supplies by 2020 (Presidential press
release, November 5).
On November 5, Chevron and the
Ukrainian government signed a production sharing agreement (PSA) to explore and
develop the Olesska shale gas deposit, an acreage straddling the
Ivano-Frankivsk and Lviv oblasts. Energy Minister Eduard Stavytsky and Chevron
Exploration and Production Europe chief, Derek Magness, signed the agreement in
Kyiv, witnessed by President Yanukovych and the United States’ ambassador to
Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
Under the agreement, the Ukrainian
state (represented by the Ministry of Energy and Nadra Ukrainy’s Nadra Olesska
subsidiary) and Chevron shall each hold 50 percent of the project’s shares.
Chevron shall make an initial $350 million investment in geological surveys and
exploration drilling during the first three years of work on the project. If
that phase is successful, the PSA’s lifetime can continue for up to 50 years,
depending on the size of the shale gas deposit. The Ukrainian side anticipates
investments of up to $10 billion for the project’s lifetime, and an extraction
volume in the range of 5 billion cubic meters (bcm) to 10 bcm per year, once
production reaches the plateau phase (Interfax-Ukraine, Ukrinform, November 5).
Ukraine’s agreement with Chevron is the
latest in a series of project agreements of comparable significance. In
September 2013, Shell and the Ukrainian government signed a PSA to explore and
develop the Yuzivske gas deposit in the Donetsk oblast. That deposit is
believed to contain shale gas as well as conventional gas. The PSA follows the
pattern of 50 percent to 50 percent distribution of shares between the
Ukrainian state (energy ministry with Nadra Ukrainy) and Shell in this case,
for up to 50 years. Minister Stavytsky estimates the total investment value at
$10 billion, and the plateau-phase production at 8 bcm per year. Shell has
committed $500 million to the first stage of exploration, starting from 2014
with plans to drill some 15 exploration wells (Ukrinform, November 7).
In August 2013, a consortium of
ExxonMobil and Shell signed an agreement of intentions with Ukraine’s Ministry
of Energy to explore the Skyfska offshore gas deposits in the western Black
Sea. The Ukrainian government chose this partnership instead of one with
Russian Lukoil. Negotiations are intended to be completed by the end of 2013)
(PRNewswires, November 5; Bloomberg, November 7).
Gas supplies sourced from liquefied
natural gas (LNG) is also a scenario under consideration in Kyiv. The Ukrainian
government proposes to draw up a Croatian-Hungarian-Ukrainian inter-governmental
agreement to construct an LNG terminal on Croatia’s Adriatic coast and to
inter-connect Croatia’s gas pipeline network with that of Ukraine via Hungary’s
(Ukrinform, Interfax-Ukraine, November 6).
Some basic aspects of the gas
extraction projects remain unclear or even unknowable at this preliminary
stage. The size of reserves, extraction costs and the commerciality of the
projects are yet to be determined. While Ukrainian officials seem confident
enough to anticipate future production volumes, the three Western major
companies involved are tight-lipped about reserves and potential production.
After the early results of shale gas exploration in neighboring Poland turned
disappointing, the general tone of debates on shale gas in Ukraine has become
more circumspect. Local opposition to shale gas projects seems also possible in
Ukraine, following local protests in Bulgaria and Romania that halted Chevron’s
and other shale gas projects there. Whether hydraulic fracturing or “fracking”
(method used to extract natural gas from shale rock formations) turns out to be
more acceptable in Ukraine than elsewhere is also far from clear.
By striving to reduce dependence on
Russian gas, and pursuing self-sufficiency, Ukraine aspires to: a) security of
supplies (optimal when the supplies are sourced internally); b) diversification
of suppliers (putting an end Russia’s quasi-monopoly); c) a competitive
internal gas market in Ukraine (with multiple suppliers), leading to lower
prices; and d) obtaining some negotiating counter-leverage vis-à-vis Russia
(when Russia’s supply monopoly comes to an end).
The United States consistently supports
Ukraine’s energy security goals. This provides at least one item of
counter-evidence to the widespread perception of US disengagement from Europe’s
East. The recently appointed Ambassador Pyatt builds on the legacy of his
predecessor, Ambassador John Tefft, promoting US-Ukrainian joint projects in
Ukraine’s energy sector.